Midterm Pin Up

Reflection on Pin Up

1.            Reflect on the pin-up for this week: Post all the images / models included in your pin up. Layout your images as in the pin up.

               I think the most successful part of the pin up was how straightforward my idea was. The fact that is was simple and clear, it made it easy for people to understand, even though my actual presentation did not go as smoothly. I liked the positive reaction from Professor Fraser and I will keep in mind to keep future projects just as straightforward. I thought a failure in my part was the actual model. Models are great representations of work, but I kind of botched it up by scaling it wrong. My model ended up smaller than I expected. The 3D Virtual Casting did not show all the information I wanted, which I can improve in the future by creating better diagrams.

2.            Reflect on your presentation: How did you structure it? How successful do you think it was? What was your overarching focus? How was it received? What kind of feedback did you receive? List one of the best questions or comments you received or that someone else received. 

               I structured it in the steps that I performed in the actual work. Such that the synthetic axons belonged in one set, while the 3D Virtual Casting were in their own set. We first presented the body diagrams, then the synthetic drawing set, and finally the 3D Virtual Casting set. I thought this was clear because it was exactly how I transitioned in between work.

3.            What are your next steps based on your feedback and your new assignment? What new discoveries have you made in your work?

               My next step would be to think through my analysis for my next project. I have discovered that I like exploring enclosures. I think that will be a nice idea to thrive from for assignment 3.2. I have also learned that forms of analysis is not only forms of discoveries that we make as individuals, but also an interpretation that we must try to have others understand.

Journal Entry: #2

In the process of creating the 3D version of of my synthetic design combined with the townhouse elevation, I kept the same theme of using each opening as my boundary. From there, I drew lines from each frame across to the opposite end. I then placed my synthetic drawing on each side of the elevation and connected it. One set was laced closer to the top and the other was at the bottom. This created a slanted connection between the two mirroring planes. This was done because of the placement of windows and doors in the house were asymmetrical. The synthetic design was placed closer to where the windows and doors existing. Whatever exists more in mass or form prevails, which would mean that the set of windows on the left hand side would be closer to the synthetic set, while the the bottom portion would not be placed near a synthetic. The dynamic between the two synthetics were much like the idea of boundaries in that it was created by the frames of the window and the doors. This created two sets of direction: a horizontal and vertical force. The two sets of direction in turn creates this set of 3D Axon.

The curves in this model is entirely based off of the flat planes that created a surface, but did not complete into one whole solid. By creating the curve in the structure, there is a base point from where the original curved plane comes from. This allows for its existence. All solids are formed because it is surrounded by other planes. Once a plane has four or more sides, it is completely enclosed to form one solid.

Design Progress



Journal Entry : #1

I believe the most significant moment of transformation occurred shortly after the inclusion of diagonal lines in the synthetic drawing set. The direct result of this was the formation of new geometrical shapes. Entirely unexpected, I had started from something that was more linear in the 90-degree and 180-degree spectrum and ended up with something with a sense of ordered playfulness. As this new diagonal element was introduced into my project, I exploited it and created new shapes. Although, I am not fond of the final outcome, I do find it intriguing that such a design can result from the combination of 90 and 180-degree lines with several diagonal lines.

In the translation process from 2D to 3D, I chose my 5^th layer, as I did not like the result of my final layer. I decided on the 5^th layer, because it displayed more of the process than my final layer. Through this layer, I had chosen several lines to outline in bold. Due to this decision, I created an interesting 3D effect on the 2D drawing. Although this is not shown too well on my rhino drawing, I like the effect that it has on paper and will further include it in my future design. I like the idea of how hierarchy can play a role in the creation of different space.

Synthetic Drawings: Design Based on (Back) Elevation of Townhouse

Rule Sets from Various Artists

Anthony Mccall and his Line Describing a Cone has an interesting system. A beam of light is emitted out of a film projector at one end of a dark room. Projecting on the screen is an animated film of a small thin arching line that creates one complete circle as it traces the outline of the circumference of a circle. Viewers are told to stand in front of this interactive art. As the viewer’s body blocks the light, the circle that appears on the screen appear to be either a concave or convex. I think interesting about this system is that it is interactive. In a sense that the outcome is created by different situations, yet the rules are the same. I chose this piece because its something simple yet thought provoking. It’s not something that people would think of as a rule, but it is at the same time. 

Source: http://images.artnet.com/artwork_images_168878_633101_anthony-mccall.jpg

In Richard Serra’s Gagosian Gallery, the art piece Cycle draws upon a different kind of system from many other artists. Serra is known for his minimalist work and in the Cycle, it’s obvious that it is a very minimalistic piece. Although there is not much to the art piece, it is obvious what Serra is trying to convey. In the swirls that he creates, he has each swirl facing the next swirl. This creates a pinwheel effect, in which the art piece seems to be swirling in one direction. This effect is emphasized by the second ring of swirls around the first set of swirls. This site-specific art acts as spatial division, as well as circulation dictation. This is also the very reason why I chose this piece. The rules for this art piece forces the viewers to act in one direction in unison with the art piece itself. 

Source: http://www.m-kos.net/wp-content/uploads/SERRA_2011_Cycle2_580.jpg

Oskar Schlemmer’s piece the drawing of a Man as Dancer, really depicts rules in a conventional way that is graceful and interesting. In the center of the art piece, there is a man in a dancing pose. In the center of his chest, circles emit out from his chest. They echo out of the page. Although, a simplistic design, the best part of the piece are the ovals that cast out from the man. An example of this would be the oval over his head connecting to his two hands. This oval overlaps with the ovals that are created from his legs. In this manner, Schlemmer continues to use this man’s body parts as extensions for the ovals. All the ovals overlap, it creates a different art piece with flow and movement in an elegant matter. I thought the rules for this piece was interesting because it is created from such simple decisions, yet it becomes so much of the whole of the art piece.

Source: http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mez9bfOaSl1qmktfq.png